- Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt opt Out of G20 Meeting Registration.
- Political Parties and Freedom Fighters in IIOJK Declare Complete Strike.
- Global Capitals Erupt in Anti-India Protests Against G20 Summit
India, currently hosting the G20 tourism working group meeting in the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), is facing increasing isolation as more countries boycott the summit. Following China’s decision to stay away from the meeting, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt have also indicated their unwillingness to attend, expressing their opposition to holding conferences in disputed territories. This diplomatic isolation puts it in a difficult position and raises concerns about its violation of international laws.
China’s Opposition and Boycott:
China, in a firm stance, declared its opposition to hosting any form of G20 meetings on disputed territory and subsequently announced its decision to abstain from the summit. The Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson, Wang Wenbin, made it clear that China would not participate in such meetings held in occupied territories. This move by China reflects its strong position on territorial disputes and its adherence to international norms.
Turkey’s Alignment with Pakistan:
Turkey, known for its consistent support of Pakistan on the Kashmir dispute, also decided to skip the registration for the G20 meeting. The Turkish government has repeatedly raised the issue of Kashmir at various international forums, displaying its inclination towards Pakistan’s stance. Turkey’s refusal to participate in the summit further isolates India and highlights the international community’s concern over the situation in IIOJK.
Saudi Arabia and Egypt Follow Suit:
In addition to China and Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have also indicated their unwillingness to attend the G20 meeting. The reasons behind their decisions are not explicitly mentioned, but their alignment with other countries boycotting the summit suggests a broader concern about the hosting of conferences in disputed territories. These actions by Saudi Arabia and Egypt add to India’s growing isolation on the international stage.
Protests in IIOJK and Global Capitals:
Simultaneously, political parties and freedom fighter groups in IIOJK have announced a complete strike in the region to protest against the G20 meeting being held in the disputed territory. Kashmiris on both sides of the Line of Control have called for a shutdown on May 22, accompanied by anti-India protests and rallies in major capitals around the world. The All Parties Hurriyat Conference and the Azad Jammu and Kashmir political leadership have jointly organized these demonstrations to highlight the issue internationally.
Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari’s Visit to Muzaffarabad:
Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari arrived in Muzaffarabad, expressing solidarity with the Kashmiris against India’s violation of international laws by hosting the G20 meeting in IIOJK. Bilawal emphasized that India could not suppress the voice of the Kashmiri people through a conference and criticized India for violating UN resolutions. His visit and statements reinforce Pakistan’s stance on the Kashmir dispute and aim to expose India’s actions to the international community.
Read more: Modi says India wants to normalize ties, but Pakistan must take steps
Conclusion:
India’s decision to host the G20 meeting in IIOJK has resulted in growing international isolation. China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt have boycotted the summit, emphasizing their opposition to conferences held in disputed territories. This move by China reflects its strong position on territorial disputes and its adherence to international norms. In addition, protests and strikes in IIOJK and demonstrations in major capitals around the world further highlight the global concern over India’s actions. Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari’s visit to Muzaffarabad adds to the solidarity shown by Pakistan towards the Kashmiri people. India’s isolation on the international stage raises questions about its adherence to international laws and norms and underscores the significance of resolving the Kashmir dispute through diplomatic means.
